<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newsbleep Ponders&#8230; Audiobooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newsbleep.com/newsbleep-ponders-audiobooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newsbleep.com/newsbleep-ponders-audiobooks/</link>
	<description>Stay in the know, now, with Newsbleep.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:01:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryce</title>
		<link>http://newsbleep.com/newsbleep-ponders-audiobooks/comment-page-1/#comment-55609</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsbleep.com/?p=136#comment-55609</guid>
		<description>Yeah, what r u a noob of pondering? FTW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, what r u a noob of pondering? FTW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacie.Make.Do.</title>
		<link>http://newsbleep.com/newsbleep-ponders-audiobooks/comment-page-1/#comment-55450</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacie.Make.Do.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsbleep.com/?p=136#comment-55450</guid>
		<description>I would accept that re-titlement (though your verbs do not agree tense-wise).  In future I guess I will have to figure out the ponderance on my own and read your statement as your conclusion?

Just trying to hold you to your own high standards. Oh yeah. Uh huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would accept that re-titlement (though your verbs do not agree tense-wise).  In future I guess I will have to figure out the ponderance on my own and read your statement as your conclusion?</p>
<p>Just trying to hold you to your own high standards. Oh yeah. Uh huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Rausch</title>
		<link>http://newsbleep.com/newsbleep-ponders-audiobooks/comment-page-1/#comment-55447</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Rausch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsbleep.com/?p=136#comment-55447</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I should have titled it, &quot;Newsbleep Ponders Audiobooks, and came to the following conclusion...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I should have titled it, &#8220;Newsbleep Ponders Audiobooks, and came to the following conclusion&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacie.Make.Do.</title>
		<link>http://newsbleep.com/newsbleep-ponders-audiobooks/comment-page-1/#comment-55446</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacie.Make.Do.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsbleep.com/?p=136#comment-55446</guid>
		<description>This is ponderous?  It&#039;s an opinion.
I am calling you out on this not fitting the definition of a ponder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ponderous?  It&#8217;s an opinion.<br />
I am calling you out on this not fitting the definition of a ponder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

